review for ‘battle in seattle’

 pictures-of-channing-tatum-battle-in-seattle-website21.jpg

written and directed by Stuart Townsend, the man most famous for being replaced in the role of Aragorn by Viggo Mortensen in The Lord Of The Rings, there is alot about this worthy if slightly pretentious film that doesn’t really work. for starters, its cast is a mishmash of the talented (Ray Liotta, Woody Harrelson), the pretty (Ivana Milicevic, Channing Tatum, Connie Nielsen) and the talented/pretty (Charlize Theron, Andre Benjamin, Michelle Rodriquez, Martin Henderson). Townsend attempts to set up a Magnolia/Short Cuts style of intercutting storylines, set against the backdrop of a meeting of the World Trade Organisation.

which runs into another problem. as Townsend himself has admitted in interviews, he had very little knowledge of what caused the tension, and sparked off the eventual riots that brought Seattle to its knees. and this is an ignorance that alot of his audience will most likely share. and while the central story itself is worthy, Townsend forgoes telling it by adding a disclaimer at the beginning of the movie: “While the setting of this movie is factual, all the characters and events therein are fiction.”

so while anyone hoping for a documentary-esque story will be disappointed, the fictional stories themselves are quite involving. Theron is a 5 months pregnant store assistant, who’s finds herself in ground zero when the riots kick off. she is the wife of Harrelson, a riot police officer, partnered with Tatum. they have been told by mayor Liotta that they are not to make any arrests whatsoever. that is until Henderson, Benjamin and Rodriguez, three ringleaders of a non-violent activist group, get caught up with a Labour strike, as well as semi-terrorist factions, and everything begins to descend into chaos. which is being all caught on camera by Nielson, and being viewed by the world, Seattle is put under a state of emergency…..

gripping stuff, non? unfortunately, Townsend can’t help tripping into cliched territory, and doesn’t have anything approaching the budget that would be required to truly show the damage that was inflicted upon the city, resorting instead to cutting to actual footage of the carnage that was shot on the day. but thats not to say that Townsend doesn’t know what he’s doing. he gets uniformly excellent performances from everyone involved (including some we didn’t know had such acting depths), and does a half decent job of making a very confusing and lengthy story quite digestable and compact (although, at only 100 minutes, the film does feel quite rushed). he even manages to create some very tense scenes (Theron trying to escape the riot filled city centre, constantly caught on the edge of a violent crowd, are some of the most nail-biting minutes of cinema in recent memory). but, again due to its length, Townsend doesn’t have equal share for everyone, and some stories are left hanging, some characters disappear for 30 or 40 minutes at a time, and some of the character connections are slighly contrived.

so, while flawed in many ways, the film is definitely recommended. for those who have no idea what the Battle In Seattle was about (as said in the film itself, it sounds like “a monster truck rally”), its a good starting point for getting to know what happened. and for those who know all too well what it was about, there are a number of good actors in interesting stories directed by a first-timer showing alot of potential.

seven out of ten.

Advertisements

2 responses to “review for ‘battle in seattle’

  1. gr8t review thnx.

    “he gets uniformly excellent performances from everyone involved (including some we didn’t know had such acting depths)”

    who? im dyin to see this movie and love most the cast. I wish you were more specific about the acting and characters played by Martin, Michelle, and Andre! still thnx. it’s stuart’s 1st time out so overall it sounds like he didn’t do half bad.

  2. I just saw it last night and my opinion is quite different from the reviewer’s. I found it to be an extraordinarily powerful film, the important film of the year (among the most important ever,) and very moving.
    As far as the negatives, to me they were petty things, minor things that bothered me for a moment till the drama pulled me back. As far as any regret that budgetary requirements had required the intersperse footage with filming, that was a plus to me: what an amazing feet that that was sone so seamlessly.!
    Some people see a film like this and say, “That technique reminded me of such-and-such movie (the “a la” s.) I see it and it reminds me of the heroic activism of the people all over the world and the critical need the world has of ours.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s